Grown up, calmed down
Your omniscient author in absentia:
No strip today. Instead, I'm working for the Clampdown.
« It's a tighty | Main | Ready and waiting »
Your omniscient author in absentia:
No strip today. Instead, I'm working for the Clampdown.
The comments to this entry are closed.
The captivating and long awaited Soxaholix eBook spinoff is finally available!
There's No Crying in Pocket Pool
Logo t-shirts now available, several colors, even pink.
Crikey! Clampdown sounds painful...
Posted by: Redsauce | 2009.04.02 at 08:47 AM
The reference to the Clash's song "Clampdown" reminds me -- There is a part to the lyrics that goes:
"You start wearing the blue and brown and / You're working for the clampdown."
Although I've heard and sung along to those lyrics countless times, I've never really understood the "blue and brown" reference.
I mean I get the overall gist that this blue and brown, like the other examples in the song, indicates some sort of resigning oneself with the status quo of taking it from "the Man," so to speak -- But I don't get specifically the blue/brown meaning.
Anyone have any answers on that?
Posted by: h.b. | 2009.04.02 at 08:50 AM
you got it, hb: working for the man, wearing your blue suit and brown shoes...
Posted by: Jim | 2009.04.02 at 09:03 AM
The only band that matters.
Posted by: James | 2009.04.02 at 09:09 AM
Really, Jim? But blue suit with brown shoes is a fashion faux pas. Or is that only in the US and in the UK it's the norm?
Posted by: h.b. | 2009.04.02 at 09:12 AM
Or the soulless employees of a mega-merged IBM and UPS?
Posted by: ParkerStPete | 2009.04.02 at 09:14 AM
Hot longy-long :)
Posted by: Harwich Rich | 2009.04.02 at 09:20 AM
I wrote a song for my buddy Robert's band that references Blue & Brown. It was the Boston version. "Blue Collar and Pearl Necklace, neighborhoods in Boston are side-by-side reckless, in Britain it's Blue and it's Brown, but it's union and Back Bay in this town."
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 09:20 AM
Get along, get along.
Posted by: Professional Hitter | 2009.04.02 at 09:30 AM
the fashion norm in UK? do we really care about their norms? should we be following their standards for cuisine? or dental hygiene?
Of course you're going back 30 years on the reference, and I didn't major in fashion marketing like a former gf...
Posted by: Jim | 2009.04.02 at 09:49 AM
Blue collar, brown pants? That's what I would have assumed. Reading through it though, I'm guessing it just means blue and brown suits (not talking about 1 day's worth of clothing, but the fact that you're locked into blues and browns as you work for The Man in general.
Now your under control, now you do what they told you...
Posted by: Kaz | 2009.04.02 at 09:53 AM
I always thought the 'blue and brown' was just a reference to fascists in general, i.e. Franco's "blue shirts" and Hitler's "brown shirts". My two cents anyway....
Posted by: stratomaticboy | 2009.04.02 at 10:05 AM
Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.
Posted by: Go Sox. Go Heels. Yankees Suck. Dook Sucks. | 2009.04.02 at 10:09 AM
I hear A-Froid (fraud+roid?)is going to re-join the Skanks earlier than anticipated.
Good. Very good.
Nothing says "Dream Team Collapse" quite like the presence of A-Donna in the clubhouse.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 10:10 AM
I got nothin'...
Posted by: Rob in CT | 2009.04.02 at 10:12 AM
Monty Python, GDGHYSDS?
One of my favorite drinking songs:
Immanuel Kant was a
real pissant who was very rarely stable,
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar who could
think you under the table, David Hume could
out-consume Schopenhauer and Hegel, And
Wittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as
schloshed as Schlegel. There's nothing Nietzsche
couldn't teach ya 'bout the raising of the wrist,
Socrates himself was permanently pissed... John
Stuart Mill, of his own free will, with half a
pint of shandy was particularly ill, Plato, they
say, could stick it away, half a crate of whiskey
every day, Aristotle, Aristotle was a beggar for
the bottle, Hobbes was fond of his dram, And Rene
Descartes was a drunken fart, "I drink therefore I
am." Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's
pissed.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 10:13 AM
Bob,I want you to cut down this tree...with a herring ;D
Posted by: Harwich Rich | 2009.04.02 at 11:19 AM
Sorry Bob - but I think ZZ Top put the phrase 'pearl necklace' to better lyrical use.
Posted by: yazbread | 2009.04.02 at 11:34 AM
It can't be done.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 11:35 AM
Actually, Ron Jeremy put that phrase to best juice. I mean use.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 11:35 AM
stratomaticboy, I always thought it was the Fascist thing, too. Part of the Irish separatist movement saw the Fascists as an ally against the UK- even buying weapons from them. In fact, the Italians were "Black Shirts" and the Irish wore blue! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blueshirts
Posted by: HunterStars | 2009.04.02 at 11:40 AM
Reminds me of the Pogues song "Boys from the county Hell":
My daddy was a blueshirt
And my mother a madame
My brother earned his medals
at My Lai in Vietnam.
Posted by: Go Sox. Go Heels. Yankees Suck. Dook Sucks. | 2009.04.02 at 12:18 PM
Hey guys -
Can anyone help me? It's driving me crazy that I've checked every Red Sox site, and still can't get an answer regarding the 24 man roster. If teams are allowed 24 men, and 5 will be starting pitchers, with 9 position starters and Baldelli/Green/Cater/Kottaras on the bench, that leaves 6 relief spots. EVERY single site persists in claiming that Papelbon, Saito, Okajima, Delcarmen, Lopez, Ramirez and Masterson will be making the team. That's 7! This is a mojor story. A legitimate big league pitcher apparently will NOT be making the team. Who? Lopez? Saito? Delcarmen? I'm baffled. Have the rosters been changed to 25? I never heard that, if it's the case. Or are we going with only 3 bench players? I can't believe none of the Red Sox reporters bother answering such a basic question. Thanks -
paddy24
Posted by: paddy24 | 2009.04.02 at 12:37 PM
It's been a 25-man roster for as long as I can remember.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 12:53 PM
(I can't remember 1986. Jameson don't ya know.)
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 12:56 PM
Uh, hasn't it always been a 25 man roster?
Today is April 2nd, right?
Posted by: Rob in CT | 2009.04.02 at 12:58 PM
Bob, no, unless it's been changed for this season, it's been a 24 man roster for years now. Maybe Saito is disabled. Also, if Penny does poorly today, they are seriously going to send him to the minors? Today's Dirt Dogs said that Buccholz would claim the 5th slot. This is getting crazy. Tazawa, Bard, Bowden and Smoltz all look great. Our bench and Varitek stink. Let's shop one of these ten billion pitchers for a proven young catcher and a quality outfielder or infielder. Baldelli is going to be useless. Crisp was such a luxury. Lots of pitching depth is great, but we have about 15 quality pitchers. If it were up to me, I would just trade or cut Wakefield, since he's useless once the playoffs roll around. I also fear that Ortiz will never be the same. He's going to be a major distraction all season. This is a guy that can't run or field, and all he did was complain last season. Throw in injuries and I don't see what purpose he serves. I like this team though. The best relief crew I've ever seen. 100 wins should not be out of reach.
Posted by: paddy24 | 2009.04.02 at 01:04 PM
Ah yes, working for the Clampdown. Me too, always.
"Let fury have the hour
Anger can be power
You know that we can use it."
Posted by: Jazz Lunatique | 2009.04.02 at 01:31 PM
25. And me too Bob, '86 is a bit of a blur.
"...begging to be melted down..."
Posted by: Jim | 2009.04.02 at 01:53 PM
that's the paddy we all love...good to see ya. in true mid season form.
I think I'll wait a bit before hitting that candy coated red panic button. see how the boys do - the trade deadline awaits and in theo we trust.
If I look like ben linus waking up to see locke, its time to hit the button
Posted by: sonomasox | 2009.04.02 at 02:11 PM
Paddy, I love you man (no homo), but it's a 25 man roster. Check out April 5, 2009 on the MLB important dates calendar. It's been a 25 man roster ever since the players requested it as part of the 1990 collective bargaining agreement ending the lockout (right column, p. 35).
Posted by: Kaz | 2009.04.02 at 02:55 PM
By the way, what do you think it would take to get Wieters away from Baltimore? They're too stupid to realize the good thing they've got going there and we need a catcher. I think we could trade them Sheffield and a few steamed lobsters for Wieters straight up.
And we don't even HAVE Sheffield to trade, but I still think Angelos would go for it. Come on, Theo, float this idea and get us that catcher!
Posted by: Kaz | 2009.04.02 at 03:04 PM
Hey Fellas -
Yes, you're supposed to wear brown shoes with a blue suit or a brown suit. Black shoes go with a with a grey suit or black suit. Or a Red Sox uni. Black shoes with blue suit? Nevah.
Posted by: RedStripe Nan | 2009.04.02 at 03:07 PM
Thanks everyone. I guess I was confused because many times I looked at the active roster for the Red Sox last season and saw 24 players. Perhaps they were too cheap to call up another player.
Posted by: paddy24 | 2009.04.02 at 04:23 PM
Sorry for questioning you, Bob.
Posted by: paddyb24 | 2009.04.02 at 04:29 PM
Sorry? Sorry???
There's no sorry on this creepy site.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.02 at 04:50 PM
we're all sorry on this creepy site.
Posted by: louclinton | 2009.04.02 at 05:51 PM
I too, always thought the song referenced the military/facist/nazi angle.
Opening lines of the song, per 2 different lyrics websites:
****What are we gonna do now?
Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown*****
Posted by: Yossarian | 2009.04.02 at 06:01 PM
i'm really fucken sorry
Posted by: soxdownunder | 2009.04.02 at 09:56 PM
as Rumpole of the Bailey said of a colleague 'He spends his life in a perpetual state of apology'
Posted by: soxdownunder | 2009.04.02 at 09:57 PM
We don't want to hear about your rump pole, SDU.
Oh, Rumpole...I'm sorry.
Posted by: Kaz | 2009.04.03 at 01:44 AM
sorry
Posted by: soxdownunder | 2009.04.03 at 03:02 AM
This thread has degraded a little for some reason.
Posted by: Bob | 2009.04.03 at 08:55 AM
Sorry :>
Posted by: Harwich Rich | 2009.04.03 at 09:46 AM
Degraded? For SOME reason? It was degraded to start if ya ask me. Anything that has the clamp in it just sounds too similar to other stuff to not get this kind of jokes. ;)
Posted by: Flirting | 2010.05.04 at 02:24 AM